Inhaled Corticosteroids Rarely Prescribed at Emergency Department Discharge Despite Low Rates of Follow-Up Care.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) prescription on emergency department (ED) discharge after acute asthma exacerbations. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify rates and predictors of ICS prescription at ED discharge. Secondary outcomes included ICS prescription rates in a high-risk subgroup, outpatient follow-up rates within 30 days, and variation in ICS prescriptions among attending emergency physicians. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of adult asthma ED discharges for acute asthma exacerbation across 5 urban academic hospitals. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate predictors of ICS prescription after adjusting for patient characteristics and hospital-level clustering. RESULTS: Among 3948 adult ED visits, an ICS was prescribed in 6% (n = 238) of visits. Only 14% (n = 552) completed an outpatient visit within 30 days. Among patients with 2 or more ED visits in 12 months, the ICS prescription rate was 6.7%. ICS administration in the ED (odds ratio [OR] 9.91; 95% CI 7.99-12.28) and prescribing a ß-agonist on discharge (OR 2.67; 95% CI 2.08-3.44) were associated with higher odds of ICS prescription. Decreased odds of ICS prescription were associated with Hispanic ethnicity (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.51-0.99) relative to Black race, and private (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.62-0.91) or no insurance (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.35-0.84) relative to Medicaid. One-third (36%, n = 66) of ED attendings prescribed 0 ICS prescriptions during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: An ICS is infrequently prescribed on ED asthma discharge, and most patients do not have an outpatient follow-up within 30 days. Future studies should examine the extent to which ED ICS prescriptions improve outcomes for patients with barriers to accessing primary care.

Barriers and Best Practices for the Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Emergency Medicine.

Patient-reported outcome measures are commonly used in clinical trials and have been incorporated into routine clinical care in select specialties but have not been widely implemented in emergency medicine research and clinical care. We describe measurement-related barriers to patient-reported outcome measure use in the emergency department; administrative and practical considerations; implications of developing novel emergency medicine-specific patient-reported outcome measures; and key considerations for the use of patient-reported outcome measures in emergency medicine research and clinical care. Despite the unique barriers of the ED environment, potential solutions include the use of ED-validated patient-reported outcome measures when available; adapting existing short-form, multidimensional patient-reported outcome measures previously validated in diverse populations, ideally using computer-adapted testing; and collecting responses during anticipated wait times. With this work, we aim to inform barriers and best practices to the use of patient-reported outcome measures in emergency medicine research and clinical care to support future, more widespread implementation of patient-reported outcome measures within emergency care. The successful adoption of patient-reported outcome measures for diverse ED patient populations within the unique constraints of the acute care environment may help researchers, clinicians, and policymakers improve the quality and patient-centeredness of acute care.

Medical Student Involvement in a Human Rights Program: Impact on Student Development and Career Vision.

Background: There is consensus among many medical school deans that exposure to human rights is a necessary component of physician training [78], however little is known about the impact of engagement in human rights programs on students' personal and professional development [1516171819202122232425262728]. Objective: This study aimed to examine medical students' experiences in the Mount Sinai Human Rights Program (MSHRP), their motivations for involvement, and the possible influence of engagement on their professional identities, personal growth, and career choices. Methods: Through semi-structured interviews, this qualitative study gathered the experiences of 15 fourth year and recently graduated medical students who participated in the comprehensive training, research, and direct service opportunities provided by the program. Responses were coded using a content analysis approach. Findings: The results of this research highlight the motivations behind students' involvement in a medical human rights program, as well as the challenges they experienced engaging with this work. The study captured students' perceptions of the role of the program on their personal growth, clinical skills, and career vision. Nearly all the students interviewed indicated they developed important, clinically applicable skills that enhanced their traditional medical education. Students indicated that their participation directly influenced their professional identities and future career directions by reinforcing previous interests in human rights and social justice work, impacting medical specialty and residency program selections and fostering commitment to working with immigrant populations. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that longitudinal involvement with the MSHRP contributed to the acquisition of important clinical skills that were not otherwise attained in students' early medical education. Findings suggest that there is significant opportunity for clinical and leadership development outside the traditional preclinical and clinical setting, and that exposure to human rights education shapes students' professional identities and career paths. Finally, the findings highlight the essential role of human rights and social justice in medical education.